Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Someone's On The Pipe

Don't know what he was smoking when he wrote this, but man it must have been some good s**t.
No More Excuses - New York Times:But that changed yesterday, when Condoleezza Rice announced her willingness to talk with Iran about nukes so long as Iran suspended its enrichment program first. As Robert Kagan of the Carnegie Endowment notes, in a swoop the U.S. has put itself back in front of events. It's taken the initiative away from Ahmadinejad and Vladimir Putin, and it's created a series of problems for Tehran.

What Rice did was set off a chain of events that could lead to a U.N. resolution on Iranian sanctions as early as July. Diplomats, book your New York hotel rooms today.

Yesterday's policy shift really began in late April, as Rice returned from a visit to Baghdad and decided it was time to bring the dispute with Iran to a head. The European Union negotiations were dissolving into disharmony and confusion. There were some indications that Iran was accelerating its nuclear program. It was clear that Iran was winning.

Rice decided to shake things up. What she had to do, to borrow the metaphor of one senior administration official, was to take the cue ball and smash it into all the other balls on the table, and so open up room for future maneuvering.

This in itself was a gutsy maneuver, for in deciding to get so active she was essentially betting her career on her ability to deal with Iran.

Quickly, President Bush and Rice agreed upon a course of action that was neither passivity nor bombing. They decided to accelerate the diplomatic process. They did this with no expectations that Iran would agree to negotiate away its nuclear program. There are no optimists in this administration about the prospects for diplomacy (though there are varying degrees of pessimism).

Instead, Bush and Rice concluded that it was necessary to exhaust diplomatic alternatives, in order to make international sanctions possible later. The U.S. had to remove everybody else's excuses for inaction.

Bush and Rice told their European and Chinese allies they would be willing to talk with Iran so long as it was in a group, so long as the Iranians suspended their enrichment program, so long as the Europeans agreed to really stick by this precondition, and so long as the Europeans, Russians and Chinese agreed in writing to a menu of sanctions to be imposed if talks never got off the ground.
Iran will be right on that. Yup, yup. They will immediately cease what they are doing (after having made overtures themselves that were ignored a few weeks ago) and do whatever it takes to make the US happy so we don't do something stupid like start a war that we don't have the troops, equipment or energy to fight.
Still, the accomplishments over the past few weeks have been impressive. Bush and Rice have created a coherent policy. They have organized the Europeans, Russians and Chinese around that policy. They have put Iran on the defensive, and forced the different factions in the regime to argue about what sort of country they wish to become. (Yesterday's public blast from Tehran was anticipated and discounted.)
Not like their opinion is all that important, is it?
Even the rollout was masterful. I called experts around the world yesterday afternoon, and all of them seemed to have just gotten off the phone with a senior administration official (or two), and all were positive about what had been achieved.
People always believe whoever blows smoke up their patoot, until they start thinking again. The Bush administration always act like it is Rush week and do whatever it takes for you to see their side.

That was some good stuff, you should share. I don't think you can handle it by yourself, it leads to distorted judgement.

Rehab is certainly an option.
Tags: , , ,

Thank Goodness!

I like Dennis, but not in this role and I couldn't stand Annie Parisse's character even though I liked her acting in other roles. I realize nobody can replace Jerry Orbach but I found Dennis Farina's character to be offensive and irritating.
CNN.com - Dennis Farina to leave 'Law & Order' - May 31, 2006:Farina has decided to leave his role as New York police Detective Joe Fontana after two seasons on the NBC drama to pursue other offers and projects being developed by his production company, his spokeswoman, Lori De Waal, said Tuesday.

The actor's movie credits include "Get Shorty," "Midnight Run," "Out of Sight" and the upcoming "Purple Violets" and "You Kill Me."

Dick Wolf, creator and executive producer of "Law & Order," said in a statement that he respected Farina's decision and looked forward to working with him again.

Farina's departure isn't the only change for "Law & Order," which has a long history of cast turnover. Assistant district attorney Alexandra Borgia, played by Annie Parisse, was killed in the season finale as she investigated a murder case.
She didn't deserve to die that way. The way they got rid of Jill Hennessy was bad enough, but at least I have Crossing Jordan.

6 Billion Per Month

Eventually that might add up to real money. That's our tax money that is being spent everywhere except on the American public. Next time you hit a pothole, the police, fire or ambulance takes too long to come to your house remember that your city and state taxes can't cover everything that the Federal government has decided the states are responsible for. I wonder if that six billion includes veteran and reporter rehab?
CNN.com - Dobbs: President, Congress ignoring crises - May 31, 2006: "The Senate Majority Leader, Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tennessee, says he wants border security first and then pushes through an illegal immigrant amnesty bill. The Minority Leader, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nevada, between attending boxing matches for free, believes requiring that English be our national language is racist.

Sen. John 'Straight-talkin' ' McCain, R-Arizona, is beginning to take on the form of a political pretzel as he shapes his pandering for a run for the 2008 presidential election. And Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, is now lined up with corporate America in supporting the onslaught of cheap foreign labor into this country while forsaking his party's historical alliance with working men and women and their families.

These men are jaw-dropping, awe-inspiring symbols of their respective party's lack of commitment to truth, the American Dream and our nation's middle class. How are we supposed to take these political leaders and the parties they represent seriously?

The answer is obvious.

As the midterm elections approach, both political parties will be treating us to their usual propaganda blitzes on wedge issues such as gay marriage, abortion, gun control and the pledge of allegiance. But it's unlikely either party will articulate policy positions on the issues of urgent importance to our middle class and those that aspire to it. Those issues include, of course, a number of outright crises that the president and Congress are ignoring, rather than resolving.

The war in Iraq continues to cost American lives and about $6 billion a month. And rather than enunciate a clear strategy for victory, the president asks us for patience while assuring us there will be more losses and challenges ahead. The Democrats stand all but mute.

Our public education system is failing nationwide. While SAT scores decline, teachers in every state fail competency exams, and our high school dropout rate shows no sign of real improvement. Both parties point to their bipartisan bandage, No Child Left Behind, rather than propose real and immediate solutions."
Political pretzel. That was funny as well as accurate. As foreclosures, gas and food continue to rise, please let's worry about a flag burning amendment or preventing marriage between people who will never be interested in heterosexuals. Let's not worry about kids who can't read, write, add or subtract. Just keep up with the neverending nationwide beauty pageant and forget about us little people who can't afford to challenge the status quo.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Dying For A Story

Modo weighs in on the tragedy that is Iraq and the perils of being a reporter instead of being a member of the 101st Fighting Keyboarders.
Live From Baghdad: More Dying - New York Times: "Several teams of doctors have been fighting to save the life, and the legs, of Kimberly Dozier, the CBS correspondent who was hurt by the roadside bomb. The single 39-year-old was a headlong, generous reporter who had spent years covering Iraq and Afghanistan.

{...}

Doctors said that her heart had stopped beating and her blood pressure had plummeted. But somehow, with the help of blood donations from those in the combat hospital, they stabilized her. (Soldiers dragged Mr. Douglas away from the burning vehicle and put a tourniquet on one of his legs that had been blasted off, but it was too late to save him.)

The administration and some right-wing commentators have blamed the press for not reporting positive news in Iraq. The radio host Laura Ingraham has suggested that the press is 'invested in America's defeat' and has mocked TV journalists for 'reporting from hotel balconies about the latest I.E.D.'s going off.'

Conservative chatterers have parroted President Bush's complaint that 'people resuming their normal lives will never be as dramatic as the footage of an I.E.D. explosion.'

But now two network personalities — Ms. Dozier and Bob Woodruff — have been severely injured by roadside bombs while embedded with the military, trying to do the sort of stories the administration wants.

'One thing I don't want to hear anymore,' Steve Capus, the president of NBC News, told The Times's Bill Carter, 'is people like Laura Ingraham spewing about us not leaving our balconies in the Green Zone to cover what's really happening in Iraq.'

Even with constricted coverage, the tally of journalists killed in Iraq is now 71, more than the number killed in Vietnam or World War II. (This war is now six months short of the United States involvement in World War II, but at least then we knew we were winning by this point.)

Shaken by the CBS losses, networks were reassessing how to cover a story with such excruciating risks. Journalists in Iraq are hamstrung in Iraq just as the troops are, struggling, with ever greater frustration and higher costs, to do the job they were sent in to do.

As the CBS war correspondent Lara Logan told CNN recently, American officials often reject her requests for optimistic stories, saying: "Oh, sorry, we can't take you to that school project, because if you put that on TV, they're going to be attacked, the teachers are going to be killed, the children might be the victims of attack. Oh, sorry, we can't show this reconstruction project because then that's going to expose it to sabotage."

An American soldier was killed in the blast that killed the CBS cameraman and soundman and injured Ms. Dozier. But more than a day after we knew everything about the CBS victims, no information had been released about him.

There is a tragic anonymity about this war. Kids die but we don't know who they are, other than their names, which turn up in small print. They do not touch everyone's lives because, without a draft, they are not drawn from every part of American society. The administration tries to play down any sense of individual loss; the president has not attended a single funeral, and the government banned pictures of their returning coffins. The Iraqi civilians who die don't even get their names in the small print.

Journalists die and we know who they are. We know they liked to cook and play Scrabble. But we don't know who killed them, and their killers will never be brought to justice. The enemy has no face, just a finger on a detonator."
Methinks the press is pissed. This war needs to come to an end but there is no end in sight. Just more dead bodies of our soldiers hidden from us and a self serving smirk in lieu of compassion and empathy for those who have paid the ultimate price.

Not one funeral. Not one. If Bush attends one now, no one will believe it is anything except to raise his sagging poll numbers. I wonder what stunt the administration will pull to distract the populace from this latest tragedy. Bush probably thinks that since the two who died were British he won't have to deal with it, but he is sadly mistaken.

His Walter Cronkite moment is on its way.

Nothing Else Matters

By way of Desi at Mia Culpa I have come to embrace YouTube. Not that I will be uploading any videos of my own but I've watched a couple on the site. Today, I don't know how she found it but she turned me on to Apocolyptica, a group of four cello players. Yes, you guessed it, Metallica has become classic, not just classic rock of the heavy metal kind. This is well worth a listen if you know the original song and if you don't, the talent of the group is pretty cool. Sort of like Bondin the fact that their parents thought they were learning classical instruments. They obviously learned very well, but just make their living playing music their parents probably don't approve of.

It brought back a memory of the time one of my brothers was learning to play the tuba. What an unwieldy musical instrument. Anyway, one day I go out to the garage where he had been banished for practice and he plays me the beginning of Smoke On The Water by Deep Purple. Cracks me up to this day. It had never occurred to me until he started playing that you could use one instrument for different kinds of music. Sort of like it can be a fiddle or a violin depending on where you're from.

I look forward to wasting my evening watching videos.

Setting Fire To A Sinking Ship

One by one, conservatives are beginning to realize what us liberals already knew. That one should come out and say so and very eloquently at that is a surprise.
McIntyre in the Morning 790 KABC-FM: "I supported the President when he sent our troops into Afghanistan, after all, that’s where the Taliban was, that’s where al-Qaida trained the killers, that’s where Bin Laden was.

And I cheered when we quickly toppled the Taliban government, but winced when we let Bin Laden escape from Tora-Bora.

Then, the talk turned to Iraq and I winced again.

I thought the connection to 9-11 was sketchy at best. But Colin Powell impressed me at the UN, and Tony Blair was in, and after all, he was a Clinton guy, not a Bush guy, so I thought the case had to be strong. I was worried though, because I had read the Wolfowitz paper, “The Project for the New American Century.” It’s been around since ‘92, and it raised alarm bells because it was based on a theory, “Democratizing the Middle East” and I prefer pragmatism over theory. I was worried because Iraq was being justified on a radical new basis, “pre-emptive war.” Any time we do something without historical precedent I get nervous.

But the President shifted the argument to WMDs and the urgent threat of Iraq getting atomic weapons. The debate turned to Saddam passing nukes on to terror groups. After 9-11, the risk was too great. As the President said, “The next smoking gun might be a mushroom cloud.” At least that’s what I thought at the time."
The rest of it is a great read since he lays out every one of the talking points that have been sending some of us into fits.

If only he had admitted he was wrong before the 2004 elections. Kerry would have been a one term president and we might have a different set of candidates for 2008. Oh well, better late than never.

Thanks for acknowledging the error of your ways, it takes a person of strong character to admit when they are wrong.

Thanks to American Agenda for the link.

Logan's A Poet And We Didn't Know It

I hated the character so much that I would throw tiny spitballs while watching at home. Fortunately the actor has a sense of humor to go along with his talent.
Entertainment Weekly's EW.com | Feature: An ode to ''24,'' by Gregory Itzin: "I am the President of the United States,
And no one dare say me nay.
I am the President of the United States,
If only for a very long day.
I set the wheels in motion,
I am the primo mobile,
I am the President of the United States,
So get the hell out of my way.

The day began so hopefully,
A treaty on the table,
Then Russian rebels intervened,
And there begins our fable.

The plan seemed such a good one,
Gain a foothold in the East,
We could stake a claim to foreign oil,
Since on fuel we do feast.

But the best-laid schemes
Oft gang agley,
Once wisely it was said,
And barely five minutes into the day,
We were bringing out our dead.

David Palmer fell fast and first,
A sniper's bullet took him down,
And at Logan's Retreat there was Chaos! Chaos!
''The Russian President has come to town.''

Mike Novick had no time to grieve
His former partner's parting,
Though wanting to, he could not leave;
An ugly day was starting.

And Bauer's up in Bakersfield,
A new life undertaken,
And learning of his old friend's fate, It's to his core he's shaken."
It's a long time until January and Day Six. Thank goodness Veronica Mars got picked up by the CW, I just wish they had picked up Everwood also.

Morality Was A Hot Topic This Weekend

At least in the blogosphere. In between all those posts this weekend I read my whole blogroll. One thread stood out. The morality of the United States policies appeared on several blogs. The ultimate responsiblity for Haditha is heating up conversations, with most feeling that it goes all the way to the top. As several people put it "what did you expect? If the leaders feel the Geneva Convention is "quaint" aren't the troops are going to feel the same way? Our American arrogance and hubris prevents us from seeing people in the rest of the world as our equals. They are human just like us, with the same feelings of love for their families that we do.

It started innocently enough with Badtux who is traveling through Louisiana and wrote a post about "honest" corruption and rebuilding after Katrina. Pretty good stuff. There's another great post up this morning, one written in 2002 which was ahead of its time.

The Daou Report had a great post on the ethics of Iraq and the differences between the left and right on moral versus material strength.

Paradox over at The Left Coaster asks if the war dead sit in judgement and wonder if it was worth dying for and are we making the best use of their sacrifice?

Just a sample of the thoughts and feelings of people who really care about this country. For the last few months I have been grateful that this country doesn't have to shave. If it did, looking in the mirror every morning would be a real bummer. How could you look at yourself day after day, knowing that you had willfully taken or caused to have taken innocent lives? While the President was trying to look patriotic by giving the commencement address at West Point, real soldiers and the people who try and report the news were killed in a war whose justification changes with every speech.

As the Haditha incident heats up we need to ask ourselves "Is this what I had envisioned when I thought it was okay to go to war?" For me the answer is yes, I did see this coming. Others, not so much. Since Sept 11, 2001 I have watched this country change into a paranoid schizophrenic. We think everyone is after us, that they are going to hurt us. We make decisions based on fear instead of rational thinking. We reward those who don't need it and take from those who do. A reverse Robin Hood syndrome if you will. I keep hoping that we will come up for air but we don't.

In Babylon 5, an extremely prescient sci-fi show from the 1990's, the character of Delenn tries to explain why her world tried to exterminate humans after we had mistakenly killed their leader. She says "we went mad together" and that is the only explanation I can come up with for our continued decline in moral behavior.

Cold-blooded murder of children and old people? There will never be a justification for taking an innocent life. If we can convict the driver of a getaway vehicle for a murder that happened inside a bank while he was outside, we can take responsibility for our country's actions and change before it is too late.

After Abu Ghraib one would hope that our servicemen had been given a little instruction in the proper behavior of a soldier. Instead, they have been put under more and more pressure. Two tours should be the maximum, but since there is no one to replace them we have to keep sending the same poor people back to fight in a country that is devolving into civil war, while expecting them to pay for their new uniforms (but no battle armor, that's a "government" contract item) on the paltry amount we give them for dying for nothing. We are creating human killing machines. Once you view people as objects it is easy to kill them. They could just as easily kill Americans in the future because they were "just following orders".

Morality and ethics? We have none. We lost the moral high ground when we lied and invaded Iraq. Now all we have left are dead and mutilated bodies, post traumatic stress syndrome and a reputation that is as tarnished as 100 year old silver that has been left outside the whole time. Meanwhile, people continue the routines of their lives in the futile hope that this won't affect them. It will.

Rot always spreads.






Goodbye Freedom Of Speech

It won't stop here. Corporations are going to jump on this like a shot. They will cite and extrapolate and away goes freedom of speech at work. This will probably be cited in the NSA warrantless wiretapping case as justification for going after the leaker and not that NSA were breaking a few other amendments themselve.
Justices, 5-4, Limit Whistleblower Suits - New York Times: "WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Tuesday made it harder for government employees to file lawsuits claiming they were retaliated against for going public with allegations of official misconduct.

By a 5-4 vote, justices said the nation's 20 million public employees do not have carte blanche free speech rights to disclose government's inner-workings. New Justice Samuel Alito cast the tie-breaking vote.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the court's majority, said the First Amendment does not protect 'every statement a public employee makes in the course of doing his or her job.'

The decision came after the case was argued twice this term, once before Justice Sandra Day O'Connor retired in January, and again after her successor, Alito, joined the bench."
This is absolutely appalling. The Supreme Court is into do-overs because they didn't like her swing vote. How much more blatant will it get? This country no longer belongs to the people. You can forget about the Supremes helping straighten out any miscarriages of justice. You can actually forget the Bill of Rights and that pesky little piece of paper, the Constitution.

What I would like to see is that every Democratic Senator who is up for reelection and voted for Scalito be replaced with someone who is interested in the demographics of the people who elected them. Unfortunately, this is just the beginning.

I'm going to hate to see the end.

Monday, May 29, 2006

From the General

Absolutely magnificent writing. The General was at the top of his game when he wrote this. You can read this excerpt or go to his site and read the whole thing. The post below it at his site will bring you to tears if you have a heart.
Jesus' General: "
But as much as I like the essay, it falls far short of adequately expressing the true horrors of this war. The young Americans who lost their limbs, their health, and their sanity are not represented. Neither are the carefree boys we grew to love as they camped out in our living room, vying for the attention of our daughters. Now, they’re returning from war, souless, their psyches destroyed forever.

And what about the Iraqi people? Thousands of innocents have paid the price for W's hubris, families--fathers, mothers, children, infants--torn apart by neocon greed and shrapnel. They are absent from the essay as well.

The American people are also missing. I watched the documentary, Control Room, again last night. One of the scenes featured an Al Jazeera reporter, Hassan Ibrahim, discussing the run-up to the war with a number of Iraqi intellectuals. He told them that he did not believe that the American people would allow the war to happen. He said that we were a rational people and a people who revered justice above all else. I once thought that too. With all of our faults, I believed that we were a people who truly believed in reason, justice, and the principles of democracy, and maybe we did, but it is no longer true.

We became vengeful and bloodthirsty, striking out against the innocent and the weak to ease our groundless fears. We are now Fox News. We are a nation of Malkins, Hewitts, and Charles Johnsons, frightened of everything that is different or alien to us and reacting violently.

My America is dead. Or perhaps more accurately, The America I believed in, and the people Ibrahim thought he knew, never existed. As saddened as I am at this realization, I now understand that I must fight even harder to ensure that we do not lose our way again.

That's why we must do everything in our power to ensure that America understands not only what happened at Hadditha, but why it happened. For those of you unfamiliar with that name, I urge you to read We found the Real Villain,” the Republican Jesus post I did last week or look for an article titled "Details Surface of US ‘atrocity’ in Iraq" in Saturday's Globe and Mail." In short, a squad of Marines, distraught over losing a comrade to an IED, murdered at least 20 people, including a 61 year old, one-legged man and at least four children, the youngest two being 3 and 4 years old.

Although I’m disgusted by the Marine’s actions and believe that they should spend the rest of their lives in prison, I also feel very sorry for them. They were placed in a very bad situation and snapped. They’ll have to live with the knowledge and consequences of what they’ve done for the rest of their lives.

Unfortunately, those who bear the most responsibility for what happened that day, the president, vice president, Rumsfeld and the rest of the administration (including Colin “the ultimate ‘yes man’” Powell) will likely never be made to pay for sending young people like these Marines to be consumed in this shitty fucking war. That’s a terrible injustice. The evil fucks deserve life imprisonment at one of their secret Eastern European prisons. "
Not that he has an opinion on the matter.

Go, General, go!

Jawohl, Herr Commandant

Track them while they are young, that way they will be used to it, then in high school you can insert chips under the skin and track them for the rest of their lives. Even living on a military base where you had to produce ID to do anything, I never felt as watched as I do now. I haven't done anything wrong but I still must be watched to make sure I don't do anything wrong, like be where I'm not expected. They say it is in the name of safety, that is the story now, in a few years it will be for something else. Our bus driver always knew who we were and what stop we were supposed to get off on. Perhaps one should look at the quality of the driver to pay attention.
High-tech tags may track kids in TUSD | www.azstarnet.com �: "He said the benefits of the program would be numerous.
Districts could track the location of their buses and note their speeds and number of kids on the bus in real time. Teachers could take attendance earlier because they would be notified that a student is headed to school. Parents could arrange their schedules to meet buses and not have kids walking alone. The program also could help administrators know exactly which kids are on a bus that's been involved in an accident or is running late.
'In the click of a mouse, they can know exactly who was on the bus, not who they think is on the bus,' Rowley said.
Bill Ball, TUSD's transportation director, said the test phase is going smoothly and he's impressed by the way he can track buses in all parts of the city.
He wouldn't give odds on the program's approval, saying that more testing and analysis is necessary this summer. Plus, he wants to consider other companies that have expressed interest in more traditional technology that would track only the buses, not the students on them.
Blenman Elementary School parent Ken New says he keeps a close eye on his 6-year-old twins, Cassandra and Marcus, but he thinks the tracking device could be a good use of technology.
'The only thing I'd be concerned about is who could get access to that kind of information,' he said.
Alessandra Soler Meetze, director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, said the technology seems to have a lot of benefits — but it shouldn't replace the human eye.
An alternative would be adult supervisors on the bus, she said.
The districtwide program would start with kindergarten through fifth-grade students, Rowley said, because they are less likely to complain about wearing a tracking device.
As the children get older, the program could work its way into middle and high schools.
'By the time a kindergartner gets to sixth grade, they'll get used to it,' Rowley said."
Access to that kind of information is what worries me. When Enemy of the State first aired, I thought it was a little far-fetched, now we know that it is understated. Shortly, you won't be able to go anywhere, spend any money, say anything you want or travel without permission.

As with most government programs this will grow all out of proportion, taking over lives. We might as well be in 1950's Russia.

Quote of the Week

Unguarded moments usually reveal what people are thinking. Sometimes the truth just pops right out.
Blair Bowed to U.S. Pressure in Speech, Paper Says: "The paper reported that during the climate change section of the speech, a cellphone rang in the audience and Blair quipped, 'I hope that isn't the White House telling me they don't agree with that. They act very quickly, these guys.'"
A little twitchy are we? Well, with all that wiretapping what would you expect? They know your every move and are working on your every thought. Frightened yet?

In the movie The President's Analyst, James Coburn was at the beck and call of the President (the one we have, needs one now). One scene took place as he was going to the bathroom, a flashing red light came on to let him know he was wanted. I always wondered how they knew where he was. That was a long time ago but it still seems to be valid in this day and age.

Thanks to The Tao of Politics for the link, I would have missed it because the rest of the story was old news. We know that Blair is a puppet, now we know he isn't all that fond of being a lapdog. Wants his independence. Good luck with that.

Yep, It's Much Safer

Shortly there won't be anybody but Al-Jazeera to report the news. My condolences to them and their families, this will be a day that many will remember with sorrow. You can forget about high profile journalists going to Iraq.
Deadly Attack On CBS News Crew, Two Team Members Killed, Correspondent Seriously Injured By Roadside Bomb In Baghdad - CBS News: "
The attack was among a slew of car and roadside bombs left about three dozen people dead before noon Monday, including one explosion that killed 10 people on a bus. Nearly all the attacks occurred in Baghdad.

CBS News Correspondent Kimberly Dozier, 39, sustained serious injuries in the attack and underwent surgery at a U.S. military hospital in Baghdad. She is in critical condition, but doctors are cautiously optimistic about her prognosis.'

Dozier and her crew are among the latest American television journalists to become casualties in Iraq. Former ABC News 'World News Tonight' co-anchor Bob Woodruff and cameraman Doug Vogt suffered severe injuries in a roadside bombing in Iraq Jan. 29, 2006. Woodruff is still recovering from serious head injuries and broken bones. Cameraman Vogt has returned home to France for more rehab.

On April 6, 2003, David Bloom, 39, an American journalist for NBC television, embedded with U.S. troops in Iraq died from an apparent blood clot near Baghdad.

All over the region, explosions began just after dawn, with one roadside bomb killing 10 people and injuring another 12 who worked for an Iranian organization opposed to the regime in Iran, police said. "
Looks like the violence is ramping up for the summer.

Justify This War, Now!

We need the real reason for the Iraq war. No more American children should ever have to recount stories like these. This is what Memorial Day is for, to remember the fallen so we DON'T DO IT AGAIN, but we never learn. It's frightening how many people want to go to war but never consider the real price that is paid. Because it is never paid by them.
After Loss of a Parent to War, a Shared Grieving - New York Times: "'He was in a Humvee, driving at night on patrol, and a homemade bomb blew up on him so bad it killed his brain,' Jacob said of his father, Staff Sgt. Brian Hobbs, 31, of the Army. 'But he wasn't scratched up that much. And that's how he died.'

Sitting across from Jacob in a circle at a grief camp over Memorial Day weekend, Taylor Downing, a 10-year-old with wavy red hair and a mouthful of braces, offered up her own detailed description. 'My dad died four days after my birthday, on Oct. 28, 2004,' Taylor said quietly of Specialist Stephen Paul Downing II. 'He got shot by a sniper. It came in through here,' she added, pointing to the front of her head, 'and went out there,' shifting her finger to the back of her head.

'Before he left,' Taylor said, 'he sat me on his knee and he told me why he had to go: because people in Iraq didn't have what we did. They didn't have enough money. They couldn't go to school. And they didn't have homes.'

An estimated 1,600 children have lost a parent, almost all of them fathers, to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
What do you mean, almost all of them fathers? How many mothers have been killed? That is a stat I would like to see. America doesn't want to see it, so you edited out that little piece of information? Why? Afraid it might be the straw that finally breaks the camel's back?
Over the Memorial Day weekend, nearly 150 of these children gathered at a hotel here in this Washington suburb for a yearly grief camp run by the Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors, a nonprofit group founded in 1994 that helps military families and friends cope with death and talk about their loss.

Burying a parent is never easy for a child, but losing a father in a violent way, in a far-off war, is fraught with a complexity all its own.

The children receive hugs from strangers who thank them for their father's courage; they fight to hold back tears in front of whole communities gathered to commemorate their fathers; they sometimes cringe when they hear loud noises, fret over knocks at the door and appear well-versed in the treachery of bombs.

And often the children say goodbye not just to their fathers but to their schools and homes, since families who live on a military base must move into the civilian world after a service member dies."
When my dad was sent to Korea we had to move out of base housing, they let us live on base but it was an out of the way trailer park next to the jail. Dependents don't mean much more than the soldiers themselves.
Many of these children are old enough to remember their fathers, but now the images are slipping away in fragments.

One memory few will ever forget is the moment they learned that their fathers would not come home. Paul R. Syverson IV, a 10-year-old with a blond crew cut and his father's face, saw a soldier at the door. "My mom saw him and started crying," said Paul, trying hard to stifle tears as he recounted how he was sent next door to play.
My dad would be gone for a year to 18 months and yes he would become a distant memory, we would always be surprised when we saw him again. Now that I look back on it, probably not as surprised as he was since we were the ones who were growing. At least my dad came home.

During the sixties dad took as many overseas tours as possible because he didn't want to go to Vietnam. His logic was that he wasn't going to die and leave a wife and three children for a war we couldn't and wouldn't win. He saw the problem developing in 1961 when we were sending "advisors". His specialty was radar, so he asked for another year in France. We came back to the States on my sixth birthday. We spent two years in Washiington (the state) and then it was off to Puerto Rico for three years. We flew back to the States on my 12th birthday. For my 13th my dad left for his first tour of Korea. Back just after my 14th gone again for my 15th and 16th. I used to think it was a plot that everything happened on my birthday, but I got a look at his military records and he graduated from basic training on May 19th, so that forever became his anniversary date. I was collateral damage to the military. Which is what these kids are.

In a few years the country will have moved on, but these lives will be forever marked by the tragedy of a war that took place thousands of miles away, for no real reason that anyone can understand since it keeps changing with the bad news.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

It's So Much Safer Over There Now

Isn't it?
Key Sunni Arab tribal head killed in Iraq - Boston.com: "Hours before lawmakers convened after a four-day recess, two coordinated bombs ripped through central Baghdad just before dawn, killing three people and wounding 21 people. The bombs, planted next to each other, went off in succession in Tahariyat Square, police 1st Lt. Thaeir Mahmoud said. Many of the injured were bystanders who rushed to the scene of the first explosion.

Also Sunday, a prominent Sunni Arab tribal leader who provided fighters to help U.S.-led forces track down al-Qaida and foreign fighters along the Syrian border was assassinated.

Sheik Osama al-Jadaan, a leader of the Karabila tribe, was gunned down as he drove in Baghdad's Mansour district, police Lt. Maitham Abdul Razzaq said. His driver and a bodyguard also were killed.

U.S. troops used al-Jadaan's followers to track down insurgents living under the protection of a rival tribe in Qaim and in a cluster of nearby towns that U.S. officials said was a staging area for smuggling weapons, ammunition and fighters into western Iraq.

The head of the provincial council in Diyala, a mixed but tense province north of Baghdad, escaped an assassination attempt that killed one of his bodyguards and injured six others. Ibrahim Bajlan was uninjured when a car bomb detonated next to his convoy in the Imam Weis area, 45 miles north of the provincial capital Baqouba.

The fresh violence came amid signs in the Iraqi capital that extremists seeking to force Baghdad residents to follow strict Islamic practices were targeting men wearing shorts, liquor stores and even barbers.

Gunmen in recent months have killed people drinking beer along the banks of the Tigris. Attackers in Baghdad last week stopped a car carrying a Sunni Arab tennis coach and two of his Shiite players, asked them to step out and shot them; the three were wearing shorts. And extremists have been distributing leaflets warning people in two mostly Sunni neighborhoods not to wear shorts, police said.

The U.S. military has said the bodies regularly turn up of people killed in sectarian attacks, by death squads and criminal violence -- including 33 last week in Baghdad province. U.S. military officials consider it one of their biggest problems in the Baghdad area."
Religious enforcement, death squads, vengeful Marines and coordinated terrorist bombs. Very little running water or flowing electricity to the people. Mess-o-patamia is right.

And they thought Saddam was bad. At least they could walk the streets in their clothing of choice and not worry about being shot on sight. Aah, the good old days.

No More Checks And Balances

The Police state is on its way. The badministration has found a way around the Founding Fathers vision of Separation of Powers. What is really sad is that it is coming from people who aren't elected to their position of power and they seem to have an inordinate amount of influence over the ones who were. Bush just signs the statements, it isn't like he objects on a personal level (that would require thinking and we all know that's hard work, he told us so) other than someone might take away his binky.
Cheney aide is screening legislation - The Boston Globe: "Previous administrations left the reviewing of legislation to the White House counsel's office and the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel.
Nah, they might quit if they don't get their way.
``What's happening now is unprecedented on almost every level,' said Ron Klain , who was chief of staff to Vice President Al Gore from 1995 to 1999. ``Gore was a very active policy maker in the Clinton administration, but that didn't include picking through bills of Congress to find things to disagree with.'

The administration insists that Bush's use of signing statements is not unprecedented. Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said, ``President Bush's signing statements are lawful and indistinguishable from those issued on hundreds of occasions by past presidents.'

The use of signing statements was rare until the 1980s, when President Ronald W. Reagan began issuing them more frequently. His successors continued the practice. George H. W. Bush used signing statements to challenge 232 laws over four years, and Bill Clinton challenged 140 over eight years, according to Christopher Kelley , a political science professor at Miami University of Ohio.

But in frequency and aggression, the current President Bush has gone far beyond his predecessors.

All previous presidents combined challenged fewer than 600 laws, Kelley's data show, compared with the more than 750 Bush has challenged in five years. Bush is also the first president since the 1800s who has never vetoed a bill, giving Congress no chance to override his judgments.
Like that would happen with the lapdog Congress we currently have.
Douglas Kmiec , who as head of the Office of Legal Counsel helped develop the Reagan administration's strategy of issuing signing statements more frequently, said he disapproves of the ``provocative' and sometimes ``disingenuous' manner in which the Bush administration is using them.

Kmiec said the Reagan team's goal was to leave a record of the president's understanding of new laws only in cases where an important statute was ambiguous. Kmiec rejected the idea of using signing statements to contradict the clear intent of Congress, as Bush has done. Presidents should either tolerate provisions of bills they don't like, or they should veto the bill, he said.

``Following a model of restraint, [the Reagan-era Office of Legal Counsel] took it seriously that we were to construe statutes to avoid constitutional problems, not to invent them," said Kmiec, who is now a Pepperdine University law professor.

By contrast, Bush has used the signing statements to waive his obligation to follow the new laws. In addition to the torture ban and oversight provisions of the Patriot Act, the laws Bush has claimed the authority to disobey include restrictions against US troops engaging in combat in Colombia, whistle-blower protections for government employees, and safeguards against political interference in taxpayer-funded research.

Cheney's office has taken the lead in challenging many of these laws, officials said, because they run counter to an expansive view of executive power that Cheney has cultivated for the past 30 years. Under the theory, Congress cannot pass laws that place restrictions or requirements on how the president runs the military and spy agencies. Nor can it pass laws giving government officials the power or responsibility to act independently of the president.

Mainstream legal scholars across the political spectrum reject Cheney's expansive view of presidential authority, saying the Constitution gives Congress the power to make all rules and regulations for the military and the executive branch and the Supreme Court has consistently upheld laws giving bureaucrats and certain prosecutors the power to act independently of the president."
No veto, no review, no chance of it appearing in court. Yup, yup we are on our way to a police state with a boy king. Unlimited power. Isn't that one of the reasons we wanted to get away from England? The idea was to make sure that no one branch of government had complete control of anything. Guess we are stupider than in Revolutionary times and so we need to be protected from ourselves. Told when, what and where we can think.

If it wasn't for the impact on the airlines, these guys would restrict travel between states just to make sure that subversive ideas of democracy don't spring up. I wish this was a joke, but it isn't.

Welcome to the United States of America, land of the free. Free to change the Constitution whenever it suits the powers that be.

Grilling Gone Mad

I am quite happy with my Weber, it does what I need it to, I can; grill, smoke or bbq and that is what I use it for. I made beef ribs the other day, they were great. Slow smoked with a dry rub. Yum!
Pimp My Grill - New York Times: "As Memorial Day marks the official beginning of grilling season, many men will find themselves almost genetically drawn to throwing hunks of raw meat onto a fire and poking them with tongs. It's a pull that some will spend almost any amount of money to satisfy, said Pantelis A. Georgiadis, the owner of Kalamazoo Outdoor Gourmet, the grill manufacturer based in Michigan. 'There is a market segment we call the 'man cook with fire' types,' he said.

When Daniel Conrad, a lawyer, moved to Dallas four years ago from Pittsburgh to join the woman who would become his wife, his parents bought him a small Weber grill. 'It wasn't big enough for my ego,' Mr. Conrad, 34, said. 'So I got this giant enormous Weber grill.'

Now, he rushes home to his wife — and to his baby, a Weber Summit Gold D6, to slow-cook ribs or experiment with smoking turkeys. 'Grilling has become my creative outlet,' Mr. Conrad said. 'The only two extravagances I have in my life are my car and my grill.' He drives a Mercedes.

And like luxury car owners, many people who splurge on a grill that can simmer, bake and fry are looking to impress.

Last fall, Dave and Allison Petrullo of Commack, N.Y., installed a custom-built Cal Spas grill on their patio with an outdoor refrigerator. They spent more than $100,000 renovating their backyard with a new synthetic deck, masonry, a whirlpool and a pool waterfall, so $6,500 more for Mr. Petrullo to have a brick sanctuary with a Cal Spas grill as its central altar seemed like nothing. 'I told him to just go for it,' Ms. Petrullo said. 'And get your dream barbecue.'

Though they have actually cooked on the grill only three times since they installed it, it has been a hit with Mr. Petrullo's friends, who congregate around it at parties and give it a going-over like a pack of high school boys around a Corvette, Ms. Petrullo said. 'They like to lift up the hood and play with the knobs,' she said. 'They open the doors underneath, and they open the fridge next to it to check it out.'
The difference between men and boys is the price of their toys. As Joe Jackson wrote, "there goes your proof". Looks don't count for much, it is all about the talent.
The high-end grill market, which generally refers to any grill that costs more than $1,000, started quietly in 1990 when Dynamic Cooking Systems, a company based in California, introduced the DCS Professional Grill. The 48-inch-wide $5,000 appliance, which included H-shaped cast-iron commercial-quality burners, a heavy-duty side-burner and more B.T.U.'s per square inch than any other grill then on the market, was adopted by a few deep-pocketed souls on the grilling vanguard.
How many people have elaborate kitchens and grills and don't know how to cook? Part of the fun of barbecueing is all the work and attention to detail. My brother had this theory about why men do the grilling. Cracked me up. He said that it is because men can only pay attention to one thing at a time and since the frill can flare up at any time, you can station a guy in front of the grill with a beer to make sure things don't burn. Meanwhile, the little woman is prepping the rest of the dinner inside. Or something to that effect.

Two thousand degrees. Wow, that would really sear a steak in a few seconds. Then you had better move it somehwhere else or it will be carbon enhanced with the inside still raw. Any spice flavor would disappear and I am not interested in baking a cake or pie in my barbecue.
Many of these grills can reach temperatures of 2,000 degrees — hot enough to melt brass — if used improperly, but grill manufacturers say temperatures should stay under a safe 1,000 degrees (which can melt lead).

"If you load it up with charcoal and light 100,000 B.T.U.'s of propane under it, you're going to have a 2,000-degree fire going," said Russ Faulk, director of marketing for Kalamazoo. "It's not going to lead to cooking success." In addition to the owner's manual, Kalamazoo tries to give in-person training to new grill owners, as do most of the other high-end manufacturers. "
Like most things, it isn't the equipment that gives you success, it is the talent at the end of the tongs. Hopefully these guys aren't mortgaging their homes to pay for these grills. Those numbers aren't looking all that good lately.

A Mile High Club Not To Belong To

I tried skydiving once. Even with my fear of heights a guy was able to talk me into taking the class. I did pretty well until my last practice landing fall which was about an eight foot drop. As my eyes went past the stage I had just jumped from my brain screamed "Are you crazy? What are you doing? You are going to die!" I flubbed the landing and decided that skydiving was not for me. Not normal to be that high off the ground.
CNN.com - First-time skydiver falls to her death - May 28, 2006: "The 44-year-old woman from West Chester, Pennsylvania, was participating in a tandem jump, her first with the AerOhio Skydiving school near Sterling, about 40 miles south of Cleveland, according to the Wayne County Sheriff's Office.

The victim's name was withheld pending notification of her family.

During tandem jumps, a novice skydiver is harnessed to the chest of an experienced jumper. When the parachute is deployed, the experienced skydiver guides the team to the ground.

A preliminary investigation by the sheriff's office indicated the woman slipped from the harness after the parachute opened."
It sounds like their was too much weight on the harness and when the chute snapped open it was enough to bounce her loose. I've met someone whose chute didn't open and they have...problems. In addition to brain damage her face was pretty messed up and she moves very slowly. As the years have gone on, she aches more and more.

Falling would be my worst nightmare. Unfortunately, it isn't the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop at the end.

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Rich On Gore

Frank just can't seem to make up his mind about Al Gore. Of course, it isn't like we get much in the way of selection.
The Cannes Landslide for Al Gore - New York Times: "Since no crowd-pleasing Democratic challenger has emerged at this early date to disrupt Mrs. Clinton's presumed coronation, the newly crowned movie star who won the popular vote in 2000 is the quick fix. Better the defeated devil the Democrats know than the losers they don't. Besides, there are at least two strong arguments in favor of Mr. Gore. He was way ahead of the Washington curve, not just on greenhouse gases but on another issue far more pressing than Mrs. Clinton's spirited crusade to stamp out flag burning: Iraq.

An anti-Hussein hawk who was among the rare Senate Democrats to vote for the first gulf war, Mr. Gore forecast the disasters lying in wait for the second when he spoke out at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco on Sept. 23, 2002. He saw that the administration was jumping 'from one unfinished task to another' and risked letting Afghanistan destabilize and Osama bin Laden flee. He saw that the White House was recklessly putting politics over policy by hurrying a Congressional war resolution before the midterm elections (and before securing international support). Most important, he noticed then that the administration had 'not said much of anything' about 'what would follow regime change.' He imagined how 'chaos in the aftermath of a military victory in Iraq could easily pose a far greater danger to the United States than we presently face from Saddam.'

At the time, the White House professed to ignore Mr. Gore's speech, but on cue in the next five days Condoleezza Rice, Ari Fleischer, Donald Rumsfeld and the president all stepped up the hype of what Mr. Rumsfeld falsely called 'bulletproof' evidence of links between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Democratic leaders in Congress, meanwhile, blew off Mr. Gore for fear that talk of Iraq might distract the electorate from all those compelling domestic issues that would guarantee victory in the midterms. (That brilliant strategy cost Democrats the Senate.) On CNN, a representative from The New Republic, a frequent Gore cheerleader, reported that "the vast majority of the staff" condemned his speech as "the bitter rantings of a guy who is being politically motivated and disingenuous in his arguments."

But in truth, as with global warming, Mr. Gore's stands on Iraq (both in 1991 and 2002) were manifestations of leadership — the single attribute most missing from the current Democrats with presidential ambitions. Of the potential candidates for 2008, only Senator Feingold raised similar questions about the war so articulately so early. The Gore stand on the environment, though still rejected by the president and his oil-industry base, has become a bipartisan cause: 86 evangelical Christian leaders broke with the administration's do-nothing policy in February.

If this were the whole picture, Mr. Gore would seem the perfect antidote to the Democrats' ills. But it's not. The less flattering aspect of Mr. Gore has not gone away: the cautious and contrived presidential candidate who, like Mrs. Clinton now, was so in thrall to consultants that he ran away from his own administration's record and muted his views, even about pet subjects like science. (He waffled on the teaching of creationism in August 1999, after the Kansas Board of Education struck down the teaching of evolution.) That Gore is actually accentuated, not obscured, by "An Inconvenient Truth." The more hard-hitting his onscreen slide show about global warming, the more he reminds you of how much less he focused on the issue in 2000. Gore the uninhibited private citizen is not the same as Gore the timid candidate.
Well, Gore has always returned to his roots, which is more than can be said for the other candidates with the exception of Feingold
.Even so, let's hope Mr. Gore runs. He may not be able to pull off the Nixon-style comeback of some bloggers' fantasies, but by pounding away on his best issues, he could at the very least play the role of an Adlai Stevenson or Wendell Willkie, patriotically goading the national debate onto higher ground. "I think the war looms over everything," said Karl Rove this month in bemoaning his boss's poll numbers. It looms over the Democrats, too. But the party's leaders would rather let John Murtha take the heat on Iraq; they don't even have the guts to endorse tougher fuel economy standards in their "new" energy policy. While a Gore candidacy could not single-handedly save the Democrats from themselves any more than his movie can vanquish "X-Men" at the multiplex, it might at least force the party powers that be to start facing some inconvenient but necessary truths."
One hopes. Fervently. Please. Something. Anything.

The leadership thinks the base is just as disposable as Bush does. They don't respect us, we don't donate enough money. They might throw us a bone based on enlightened self-interest, like getting reelected, but nothing I can take to the bank. Their voting record for the last six years leaves quite a bit to be desired. Scalito, bankruptcy, judges, Iraq, etc. They couldn't even be unanimous in their disapproval. Better to stand for a principle than to lay down for nothing. I at least try to leave some bruises on them when someone walks all over me. Democrats, not so much.

What Are They Teaching In Basic Training?

Anything? So far this week has not been kind to the military. This story makes me sick from anger and frustration. It was bad enough when we demonstrated to the world that we felt that the Geneva Convention was mutable, the Uniform Code of Military Justice seems not to have been taught at all and now this story reveals the real lack of training. Who was their firing instructor, Dick Cheney? The truth comes out, eventually. Maybe not in time to make a difference, but it does come out.
CNN.com - Investigation reveals new Tillman questions - May 27, 2006: "As they emerged from the canyon, the soldiers in the vehicle were firing with an abandon that one Army investigator said demonstrated gross negligence. The soldiers later said that they thought the enemy was all around them. As they fired in all directions, they began hitting U.S. troops. The platoon leader was hit in the face and another soldier shot in the leg.

From Tillman's position up on the ridge came anguished cries of alarm. First, the Afghan soldier was shot and killed by the soldiers in the Ranger vehicle. The soldier standing alongside Tillman described what he witnessed in a sworn statement.

'A GMV [vehicle] with a .50-cal rolled into our sight and started to unload on top of us,' he said.

'Tillman and I were yelling 'Stop! Stop! Friendlies! Friendlies! Cease fire!' But they couldn't hear us.'

According to another sworn statement obtained by CNN, the driver of the Humvee was initially confused when he saw the Afghan soldier with Tillman on the ridge -- and then realized others in his Humvee were firing on fellow Rangers.

'I yelled twice 'We have friendlies on top!'' said the driver. 'The crew must have not heard me because my vehicle opened fired on them. I screamed, 'No!' and then yelled repeatedly several times to cease fire. No one heard me.'
'We thought it was over'

Tillman threw a smoke grenade to signal they were Rangers, and for a few moments, it appeared to work.

'We thought the battle was over,' said the soldier next to Tillman. 'So we were relieved, getting up stretching out and talking with one another when I heard some 5.56 rounds coming from the vehicle. They started firing again. That's when I hit the deck and started praying.'

But Tillman didn't get down in time. He was hit.

'I know this because I could hear the pain in his voice as he called out: 'Cease fire! Friendlies! I am Pat (expletive) Tillman damn it!'' the soldier said. 'He said this over and over again until he stopped.'

Moments later, a sound caught the attention of the soldier next to Tillman.

'I heard what sounded like water pouring down,' he said. 'I then looked over at my side to see a river of blood coming down from where he was. I had blood all over my shoulder from him and when I looked at him, I saw his head was gone.'"
The military lied to his brother immediately and then lied to his family and the world for two years. When I joined they were worried that an all-volunteer army wouldn't want to fight when the chips were down. Well, he joined with the best of intentions and what did it get him? Killed by friendly fire with a coverup.

For someone who demonstrated so much honor, this is a shame. His poor family.

Pretty Small-Minded

I lost all that weight, got a reduction and now they aren't going to make petite sizes? I am 5"1 and just because I am 50 doesn't mean that I want to dress like a frump. I also don't want to dress like a 20 year old floozy. My sister-in-law is 4"11 and she has it even harder. We are not children and shouldn't have to shop in the kid's department.
Where's the Petite Department? In Many Stores, It Doesn't Exist - New York Times: "But the love affair with little women appears to be over. Three of the country's most influential fashion emporiums — Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue and Bloomingdale's — have quietly eliminated or drastically scaled back their petite departments in the past several months, infuriating many longtime customers.

Given that manufacturers produce clothing in only a handful of standard sizes — among them, juniors, misses and plus size — the abandonment of petite sizes at the highest levels of American retailing represents a sea change in fashion, forcing some designers to either stop making special sizes for smaller women or re-evaluate how much to invest in the business.

Executives at the three department stores said the decision was based on the poor sales of petite sizes, which are traditionally designed for a women 5-foot-4 or smaller, with pant lengths and jacket proportions cut accordingly. Petite women, they said, would rather wear the more youthful, skin-baring and tighter-fitting clothing in the contemporary departments, even if it does not fit them as well. And, they point out, there is always tailoring."
Great, because I'm short I get penalized by having to pay someone to cut off material I don't need? That won't change where the knee falls on pants. Extra time and money is all this means to me. This is short people discrimination. Were they listening to Randy Newman or something?

I don't want to wear sweats and jeans for the rest of my life. Even though they are comfortable.

When All You Want Is A Phone

I want a cell phone that works when I need it, has bluetooth capability (I don't like wires) and a cheap rate plan. I don't need music or video, I have an Ipod and V-Cast is an extra $15 a month plus downloads. Itunes does a better job thank you. Plus, my internet service is Verizon. Why should I give them any more money for services I don't need or use?
Some Cell Phone Owners Spurn Gadgetry - New York Times: "So far, Sprint Nextel is doing something right as its subscribers spend the highest average amount for data services in the industry.

''We believe there's a strong correlation between our standard of success and how usable the products are,'' he said.

The other major wireless providers use similar techniques to improve their devices and programs.

Cingular Wireless, the nation's largest wireless provider, developed MEdia Net, which allows users to personalize their phones for using the Internet, downloading ringtones or getting e-mail.

Verizon Wireless has V-Cast, a service that makes it easier to download music and video. The company has also pushed designs that allow users to accomplish many things with one button press.

''It's not fun to download a ringtone and have to figure out how to get that on your phone,'' said Verizon spokeswoman Brenda Ramey. ''We do not shy away from testing. If the device or service doesn't work, it's a reflection on our network.''

T-Mobile also has focused on a few key areas, introducing T-Zone to help customers find ringtones and screen wallpaper by subject and decreasing the number of steps to take and send photos, for example."
I wish I still had my old StarTac. That was a great phone.

So True

I always used to wonder as I went through school, when was I going to have a geography class? I never had one. Fortunately for me, my dad was stationed around the world and my private world consisted of books about anywhere besides where I was (sort of like Yoda/s assessment of Luke). I have been reading since I was two and a half, it was my main activity until my mid-thirties, when I made the mistake of going back to school and the old eyes gave out at the same time. Then came the internet. Along the way, I read the papers and newsmagazines, but I'm still better at spelling than geography. During the seventies half of Africa changed its name, the eighties and nineties redesigned Europe and Asia, countries are still breaking apart. Here is a link to a fun and extremely interactive geography game.
War of the Worlds - New York Times: "Whereas students who ready themselves for the spelling bee typically begin with the bee's word list, geography bee contestants have no such handy resource. Instead, they must be more creative and resourceful, relying on a combination of atlases, almanacs and publications. They also usually become voracious newspaper readers; my son often began his mornings boning up on international news in the daily paper.

The geography bee's questions, too, require a different level of thinking. The spelling bee contestants rely on memorization or knowledge of etymology. The geography bee asks competitors to connect many more dots through a broad understanding of political, cultural and environmental factors.

Consider this question from last year's bee: 'Tropical storms and population growth have been contributing factors in a major housing shortage on the largest island in the Greater Antilles. Name this island.' (Cuba.) Or this one: 'The Yucat�n Peninsula is to Mexico as the Kola Peninsula is to what?' (Russia.)

True, spelling is a gateway to understanding language, but what possible value is there to knowing how to spell 'appoggiatura' (a musical embellishment) and 'pococurante' (an indifferent person), to name two of the more recent winning words? By contrast, knowing about Cuba or Russia means knowing about Communism, the political ideology that has informed much of America's foreign policy in the past half-century.

And yet the spelling bee continues to receive all the attention. Perhaps that's because spelling is a tantalizingly easy concept to grasp. You either spell a word right or you don't. The answers are all in the dictionary."
One of the reasons I like arithmetic (only one right answer) which is different from math. Calculus and I didn't really get along.

Don't Let The Screen Door Hit You

On the way out. Who are these people? So, our President folds with a little threat from inside. The CIA guy was replaced, these guys were replaceable. Who makes the policy in this country that one can threaten to leave their job, that they serve at the Presidents request, and get away with it? Who is running this country? I thought the President was in charge, or at least the man behind the curtain who has been pulling the strings. So Gonzales has the Power.
Gonzales Said He Would Quit in Raid Dispute - New York Times: "Mr. Gonzales was joined in raising the possibility of resignation by the deputy attorney general, Paul J. McNulty, the officials said. Mr. Gonzales and Mr. McNulty told associates that they had an obligation to protect evidence in a criminal case and would be unwilling to carry out any White House order to return the material to Congress.

The potential showdown was averted Thursday when President Bush ordered the evidence to be sealed for 45 days to give Congress and the Justice Department a chance to work out a deal.

The evidence was seized by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents last Saturday night in a search of the office of Representative William J. Jefferson, Democrat of Louisiana. The search set off an uproar of protest by House leaders in both parties, who said the intrusion by an executive branch agency into a Congressional office violated the Constitution's separation of powers doctrine. They demanded that the Justice Department return the evidence.

The possibility of resignations underscored the gravity of the crisis that gripped the Justice Department as the administration grappled with how to balance the pressure from its own party on Capitol Hill against the principle that a criminal investigation, especially one involving a member of Congress, should be kept well clear of political considerations.

It is not clear precisely what message Mr. Gonzales delivered to Mr. Bush when they met Thursday morning at the White House, or whether he informed the president of the resignation talk. But hours later, the White House announced that the evidence would be sealed for 45 days in the custody of the solicitor general, the Justice Department official who represents the government before the Supreme Court. That arrangement ended the talk of resignations."
Maybe we can be talking about impeachment by then. Or, better yet, what does the Attorney General have on the President that made him try not to look impotent? Why was 45 the magic number? Are they hoping that after 45 days that everyone would have forgotten? I know they have gotten away with a lot in this badministration, but being bossed around by your underlings will not be slipping my mind anytime soon.

One more reason why the President is a lame duck. Why don't these guys just call a press conference and rip up the Constitution in our faces and just be honest about the new rules of order? They investigate everybody but themselves. That might be why they don't find anything. They are looking in all the wrong places.

Not that I think Jefferson is all that innocent, but Bushco has been setting way too many precedents and breaking traditions at the drop of a hat. The FBI didn't raid DeLay's office or Bob Ney for that matter.

With a little luck maybe this will tip the scale over a little too far for the comfort of most people.

Update: From the Washington Post a little more on the temper tantrum.
Justice prosecutors and FBI agents feared that the White House was ready to acquiesce to demands from House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) and other lawmakers that the materials be returned to the Louisiana congressman, who is the subject of a criminal probe by the FBI. Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, David S. Addington, was among the leading White House critics of the FBI raid, telling officials at Justice and on Capitol Hill that he believed the search was questionable, several sources familiar with his views said.

Administration officials said yesterday that the specter of top-level resignations or firings at Justice and the FBI was a crucial turning point in the standoff, helping persuade President Bush to announce a cease-fire on Thursday. Bush ordered that the Jefferson materials be sealed for 45 days while Justice officials and House lawmakers work out their differences, while also making it clear that he expected the case against Jefferson to proceed.

Spokesmen for the White House, Cheney's office, the Justice Department and the FBI declined to comment, saying they would not discuss internal deliberations.

White House officials were not informed of the search until it began last Saturday and did not immediately recognize the political ramifications, the sources said. By Sunday, however, as the 18-hour search continued, lawmakers began lodging complaints with the White House.
When all is said and done, history will reveal that Bush is one of the weakest presidents we have ever had. This does not reflect well on the person supposedly running the country and shouldn't be tolerated. If we supposedly don't negotiate with terrorists, why capitulate to a whiney threat from the people who are serving at your pleasure. Spineless.
Makes one wonder.

In Case You Were Wondering

If this has been a philosophical question that you might have pondered at least once in your life, they now have the answer.
CNN.com - Chicken and�egg�debate unscrambled - May 26, 2006: "Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.

Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.

Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.

Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.

The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.

'Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg,' he added. 'So, I would conclude that the egg came first.'

The same conclusion was reached by his fellow 'eggsperts' Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns."
I wonder how many of these guys are Rhodes Scholars? Just a bit of useless information to start your day.

Friday, May 26, 2006

Our Country's Folly

This is going to go down as one of the most shameful periods in our nation's history. It makes me nostalgic for A Few Good Men. No, not the nutty actor, but the ideal.
Don't Become Them - New York Times: "The investigation indicates that members of the Third Battalion, First Marines, lost it after one of their men was killed by a roadside bomb, going on a vengeful killing spree over about five hours, shooting five men who had been riding in a taxi and mowing down the residents of two nearby houses.

They blew off the Geneva Conventions, following the lead of the president's lawyer.

It was inevitable. Marines are trained to take the hill and destroy the enemy. It is not their forte to be policemen while battling a ghostly foe, suicide bombers, ever more ingenious explosive devices, insurgents embedded among civilians, and rifle blasts fired from behind closed doors and minarets. They don't know who the enemy is. Is it a pregnant woman? A child? An Iraqi policeman? They don't know how to win, or what a win would entail.

Gen. Michael Hagee, the Marine Corps commandant, who has flown to Iraq to talk to his troops about 'core values' in the wake of Haditha and a second incident being investigated, noted that the effect of this combat 'can be numbing.'

A new A&E documentary chronicles the searing story of the marines of Lima Company, 184 Ohio reservists who won 59 Purple Hearts, 23 posthumously. Sgt. Guy Zierk recounts kicking in a door after an insurgent attack. Enraged over the death of his pals, he says he nearly killed two women and a 16-year-old boy. 'I am so close, so close to shooting, but I don't.' he says. 'It would make me no better than the people we're trying to fight.'

Retired Maj. Gen. John Batiste, one of those who called for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation, told Chris Matthews that blame for Haditha and Abu Ghraib lay with 'the incredible strain bad decisions and bad judgment is putting on our incredible military.'

While it was nice to hear President Bush admit he had made mistakes, he was talking mostly about mistakes of tone. Saying he wanted Osama bin Laden 'dead or alive' would have been O.K. if he had acted on it, rather than letting Osama go at Tora Bora and diverting the Army to Iraq."
It took a while, but her claws did come out. So, bin Forgotten is traipsing around five years after 9/11 and all we have to show for it are some incriminating photos, collateral damage of thousands of innocent civilians, some deliberately and with malice aforethought, plus worldwide condemnation? What's up with that?

Is this the American ideal (not Idol!) you want to be proud of? Are you sure?

Friday Shuffle

It has been a violent day in the news, how about a little music?

1. Back To The Rivers of Belief by Enigma
2. Us and Them by Pink Floyd
3. Promenade by Peter White
4. Shock The Monkey by Peter Gabriel
5. I'm Bad, I'm Nationwide by ZZ Top
6. I Shot The Sheriff by Eric Clapton
7. Time Tough by Toots and the Maytals
8. Dreamin' by George Benson and Earl Klugh
9. All Right Now by Free
10. The Grand Illusion by Styx
I really wonder about my Ipod and the shuffling capabilities.
Tags: ,

Love The Stuff

I enjoy kimchi and have ever since my dad brought some back from when he was stationed in Korea. I was 14 and must have eaten half his stash. Fermented cabbage, yum! I just don't eat it that regularly. I think I'll make some Korean spinach, buy some kimchi and grill a piece of fish for dinner. Sounds good to me.
Koreans' Kimchi Adulation, With a Side of Skepticism - Los Angeles Times: "
Nowadays, with refrigeration, less salt is needed, Park said. Instead of preserving kimchi by burying it in earthenware jars in the garden, many Koreans own specially designed refrigerators to keep it at ideal temperatures.

The beneficial power of kimchi comes from the lactic acid bacteria (also found in yogurt and other fermented foods) that helps in digestion and, according to some researchers, boosts immunity. In addition, the vegetables are excellent sources of vitamin C and antioxidants, which are believed to protect cells from carcinogens. The high fiber content aids bowel function.

Although the most recognizable kind of kimchi is made with Chinese cabbage, other variants are made with radish, garlic stalks, eggplant and mustard leaf, among other ingredients. In all, there are about 200 types of kimchi — plastic models of which are on display at the kimchi museum in Seoul.

Korean pride swelled when the U.S. magazine Health listed kimchi in its March issue as one of the world's five most healthful foods. (The others are yogurt, olive oil, lentils and soy.)

In fact, interest in kimchi's curative properties has risen proportionally with fears related to diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and avian flu."
Too much spicy food isn't good for you, but in small amounts it is very healthful. Kimchi isn't so much spicy as fragrant.

Inside Job Equals Lifetime Appointment

The separation between the common man and the elite continues. There was a reason his qualifications were downgraded, cronyism only goes so far. Three years to get an appointment. Why didn't Bush just recess appoint him and then issue an Executive Order making it the way to appoint judges from now on?
CNN.com - White House aide confirmed to federal bench - May 26, 2006: "In a statement, Bush said Kavanaugh will be 'a brilliant, thoughtful and fair-minded judge.'

The vote marked the latest in a string of confirmations for conservative appellate court nominees in the year since a centrist group of senators agreed on terms designed to prevent a meltdown over Bush's conservative picks.

Kavanaugh was not mentioned by name in an agreement announced by the so-called Gang of 14, but his nomination was pending at the time and he figured in the discussions. More recently, the seven Democrats who were members of the group had intervened in his case, calling for a second Judiciary Committee hearing into his appointment. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, chairman of the panel, agreed, defusing any threat of a filibuster designed to block a vote.

Still, Democrats highlighted the American Bar Association's recent downgrading of their rating of Kavanaugh from 'highly qualified' to 'qualified.'

'It's clear that he is a political pick being pushed for political reasons,' said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. 'This is not a court that needs another rubber stamp for this president's exertion of executive power.'

The White House and Specter said Kavanaugh's Ivy League education, a Supreme Court clerkship and other work have prepared him well to become a federal judge. Specter's committee approved the nomination along party lines.

'It is hardly a surprise that Brett Kavanaugh would be close to the president because the president selects people in whom he has confidence,' Specter said. 'Brett M. Kavanaugh must be confirmed.'"
Well, you got your wish. I just want to know what that compromise was for. They haven't used anything to stop two Supremes and a slew of conservative underlings.

What the heck is the point? Gang of 14? More like the kindergarten 14.

Have Uniform, Will Shoot Part 2

I keep trying to believe this story isn't true, but no matter how hard I try the evidence is rolling in. As a veteran and a human being, I hang my head in shame. This is an atrocity that the Corps reputation and many years of honorable service do not deserve.
Military Expected to Report Marines Killed Iraqi Civilians - New York Times: "Evidence indicates that the civilians were killed during a sustained sweep by a small group of marines that lasted three to five hours and included shootings of five men standing near a taxi at a checkpoint, and killings inside at least two homes that included women and children, officials said.

That evidence, described by Congressional, Pentagon and military officials briefed on the inquiry, suggested to one Congressional official that the killings were 'methodical in nature.'

Congressional and military officials say the Naval Criminal Investigative Service inquiry is focusing on the actions of a Marine Corps staff sergeant serving as squad leader at the time, but that Marine officials have told members of Congress that up to a dozen other marines in the unit are also under investigation. Officials briefed on the inquiry said that most of the bullets that killed the civilians were now thought to have been 'fired by a couple of rifles,' as one of them put it.

The killings were first reported by Time magazine in March, based on accounts from survivors and human rights groups, and members of Congress have spoken publicly about the episode in recent days. But the new accounts from Congressional, military and Pentagon officials added significant new details to the picture. All of those who discussed the case had to be granted anonymity before they would talk about the findings emerging from the investigation."
Nobody wants to be associated with this story. As if Abu Ghraib and Gitmo weren't bad enough. This is ridiculous. What happened to honor? This isn't a videogame where you hunt down victims for points. These were real people with families that loved them. This sounds like pure revenge killing and that is beneath everything that the Marines and this country supposedly stand for.

I'm beginning to wonder about our national ethics. What are they really?

Thursday, May 25, 2006

No Kidding!

Obviously the jury didn't believe them, otherwise they wouldn't have been convicted. D'oh! Besides it was a pretty dumb defense. Your in charge and you don't know what is going on? What are you, the head of the VA?
Ignorance Claim Did Not Sway Enron Jury - New York Times: "They simply could not believe, the eight women and four men of the jury explained in an extraordinary joint news conference after rendering their verdict, that Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling were telling the truth when they claimed they didn't realize that something was rotten at Enron.

How, they repeatedly wondered, could Enron's former chief executives not have known what was going on?

The jurors said they found the testimony by Mr. Lay and Mr. Skilling in their own defense — which many legal experts had warned could prove to be their undoing — both revealing and damning.

Freddy Delgado, an elementary-school principal, questioned how the two men could testify that they 'had their hands firmly on the wheel' at Enron and then say that they did not know about the improper accounting and the intensifying financial problems?

After all, parents hold him accountable for their children's welfare and safety. 'I can't say that I don't know what my teachers were doing in the classroom,' Mr. Delgado said. 'I am still responsible if a child gets lost.'

'So I would say that to say that you didn't know what was going on in your own company,' Mr. Delgado added, 'was not the right thing.'

After sitting through a 16-week trial and listening to 56 witnesses, the jurors finally had a chance to speak. And gathering together in a sixth-floor room at the federal courthouse here, several blocks from Enron's former headquarters, that's exactly what they did.

In other high-profile cases, many jurors quickly dispersed to avoid reporters. But all of the Enron jurors, including the three alternates, attended the hourlong session. Facing dozens of reporters and TV cameramen, they calmly and patiently answered questions, appearing unburdened and frequently cracking jokes. If they had any doubt or hesitation about the verdict they had reached in the biggest corporate corruption case in recent American history, they didn't show it"
Caught with their hands in the cookie jar and crumbs on their chins. These guys thought they were invincible and that nobody would find them guilty.

Oh well, better luck in jail.